Kabod online dating system

26-Nov-2019 04:16

The only OT reference to such a martyrdom appears to refer to a prophet Zechariah who was a son of Jehoiada the priest, a story to be dated no later than 800 B. One might suppose that Jehoiada the priest had a son Berechiah, no longer known apart from the NT, and that it was his son Zechariah who was murdered.

The great age of Jehoiada at his death (130 years; 2 Chron. As Matthew suggests, Jesus is referring to the first (Abel) and last (Zechariah) prophetic martyrs in terms of their canonical appearance, Gen. 24 respectively, and not as the first and last chronologically.

A more perplexing and serious problem regarding Zechariah is the possibility of his being identified by Jesus in the gospels (Matt. A further complication is that there was also a Zechariah son of Jeberechiah who was an acquaintance of the prophet Isaiah (Isa. Though he is not described in Isaiah as a prophet, it is likely that he was, particularly because he served as a witness, along with Uriah the priest, to the message YHWH was delivering to Isaiah.

; Luke ) as the “Zechariah son of Berachiah” who was slain between the sanctuary and the altar. The name Jeberechiah is clearly not a difficulty, being but a fuller writing of Berechiah. The problem with this explanation, of course, is that there is no record of the violent death of this Zechariah.

Exegesis and Exposition Though the technical terms for vision, such as ), are lacking here and throughout the whole vision section, it is most obvious that the prophet is recounting a series of dream-visions that he saw all in one night.

The reference to the former prophets and their cry of repentance echoes the verdict of the history of the northern tribes following the collapse of Samaria under the Assyrians in 722 B. The defeat of Israel, the historian had said, came about because Israel had sinned against YHWH by “fearing other gods” and “walking in the statutes” ( “covenant”).

Zechariah next turns his attention to the calamity that overcame the ancestors because of their failure to heed.

1:4 For the clearly mispointed Kethib This second introduction in the book embraces all the visions to follow (1:8—), as is clear from the absence of another until chap. It is also the mark of a subdivision of the book following the general introduction of 1:1-6. C., in the modern calendar (see Introduction to Zechariah, p. This is approximately three months after the initial call of Zechariah (1:1) and two months after Haggai’s last revelation (Hag. It is quite possible that the vision introduced first on that date was prompted by the need to affirm Haggai’s endorsement of Zerubbabel as the signet of YHWH (Hag. That notion of dominion is central in the first vision. May, with some plausibility, argues that the New Year ritual of coronation may be in view.

In the strict sense, the first vision itself consists of vv. The return of Darius to Persia from Egypt, through Palestine, may also have given rise to elements of the vision, particularly the horsemen. New Year’s day was coming shortly, a time when Zerubbabel could be crowned as the Davidic successor.

Exegesis and Exposition Though the technical terms for vision, such as ), are lacking here and throughout the whole vision section, it is most obvious that the prophet is recounting a series of dream-visions that he saw all in one night.The reference to the former prophets and their cry of repentance echoes the verdict of the history of the northern tribes following the collapse of Samaria under the Assyrians in 722 B. The defeat of Israel, the historian had said, came about because Israel had sinned against YHWH by “fearing other gods” and “walking in the statutes” ( “covenant”).Zechariah next turns his attention to the calamity that overcame the ancestors because of their failure to heed.1:4 For the clearly mispointed Kethib This second introduction in the book embraces all the visions to follow (1:8—), as is clear from the absence of another until chap. It is also the mark of a subdivision of the book following the general introduction of 1:1-6. C., in the modern calendar (see Introduction to Zechariah, p. This is approximately three months after the initial call of Zechariah (1:1) and two months after Haggai’s last revelation (Hag. It is quite possible that the vision introduced first on that date was prompted by the need to affirm Haggai’s endorsement of Zerubbabel as the signet of YHWH (Hag. That notion of dominion is central in the first vision. May, with some plausibility, argues that the New Year ritual of coronation may be in view.In the strict sense, the first vision itself consists of vv. The return of Darius to Persia from Egypt, through Palestine, may also have given rise to elements of the vision, particularly the horsemen. New Year’s day was coming shortly, a time when Zerubbabel could be crowned as the Davidic successor.Zechariah, here identified as the son of Berechiah and grandson of Iddo, is referred to otherwise only in Ezra (5:1; ) and Nehemiah () in the OT.